Bivalirudin versus heparin in STEMI after BRIGHT-4 trial: an updated meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of bivalirudin-based anticoagulation over heparin-based anticoagulation for coronary percutaneous intervention has been debated for a long time. Multiple trials have shown promising benefits of bivalirudin over heparin therapy with the most recent addition being the BRIGHT-4 trial. We performed a meta-analysis to assess evidence from these trials, focusing on the coronary intervention of the STEMI population. METHODS: This meta-analysis was performed based on PRISMA guidelines after registering in PROSPERO (CRD42023394701). Databases were searched for relevant articles published before January 2023. Pertinent data from the included studies were extracted and analyzed using RevMan v5.4. RESULTS: Out of 2375 studies evaluated, 13 randomized control trials with 24 360 acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients were included for analysis. The bivalirudin-based anticoagulation reduced the net clinical events (OR 0.75, CI 0.61-0.92), major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (OR 0.85, CI 0.74-0.98), any bleeding (OR 0.61, CI 0.45-0.83), major bleeding (OR 0.54, CI 0.39-0.75), all-cause mortality (OR 0.79, CI 0.67-0.92) and cardiac mortality (OR 0.78, CI 0.65-0.93) significantly without increasing the risk of any stent thrombosis (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.52-1.61), definite stent thrombosis (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.62-2.22) and acute stent thrombosis (OR 2.06, 95% CI 0.69-6.09) significantly at 30 days. CONCLUSION: Based on this meta-analysis, bivalirudin plus a post-PCI high-dose infusion-based anticoagulation during STEMI PCI has significant benefits over heparin therapy for cardiovascular outcomes without a significant increase in the risk of thrombotic outcomes.

Racial disparities in women with ST elevation myocardial infarction: A National Inpatient Sample review of baseline characteristics, co-morbidities, and outcomes in women with STEMI.

BACKGROUND: A third of the patients admitted with Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Previous studies showed that females with STEMI have higher mortality than men. HYPOTHESIS: There exist significant disparities in outcomes among women of different races presenting with STEMI. METHODS: National inpatient sample (NIS) data was obtained from January 2016 to December 2018 for the hospitalization of female patients with STEMI. We compared outcomes, using an extensive multivariate regression analysis amongst women from different races. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were revascularization use, procedure complications, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Of 202 223 female patients with STEMI; 11.3% were African American, 7.4% Hispanic, 2.4% Asian, and 4.3% another race. In-hospital mortality was higher in non-Caucasian groups. African American (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.30; p < .01) and another race (aOR 1.37; 95% CI: 1.15-1.63; p < .01) had higher odds of mortality when compared with white women. African American (aOR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.62-0.72; p < .01), Hispanics (aOR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74-0.88; p < .01), and Asian (aOR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.90; p < .01) had lower odds of percutaneous intervention (PCI) when compared with whites. African Americans had fewer odds of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) and use of Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) during the index admission. Non-Caucasians had more comorbidities, complications, and healthcare utilization costs. CONCLUSION: There are significant racial disparities in clinical outcomes and revascularization in female patients with STEMI. African American women have a higher likelihood of mortality among the different races. Females from minority groups are also less likely to undergo PCI.

Safety and efficacy of cerebral embolic protection devices for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An updated meta-analysis.

Background and Aims: Cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices are employed to capture embolic debris and reduce the risk of stroke during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Evidence is mixed regarding the safety and efficacy of CEP. We aimed to summarize the safety and effectiveness of CEP use during TAVR. Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase, were searched using relevant search terms for articles relating to CEP. All relevant data from 20 studies were extracted into a standardized form. Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.4. Odds ratio (OR) or mean differences (MDs) were used to estimate the desired outcome with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Twenty studies (eight randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) involving 210,871 patients (19,261 in the CEP group and 191,610 in TAVR without the CEP group) were included. The use of CEP was associated with a lower odds of 30-day mortality by 39% (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.53-0.70) and stroke by 31% (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.92). Comparing devices, benefit in terms of mortality and stroke was observed with the use of the Sentinel device (Boston Scientific), but not among other devices. No differences were observed in the outcomes of acute kidney injury, major or life-threatening bleeding events, or major vascular complications between groups. When only RCTs were included, there were no observed differences in the primary or secondary outcomes for CEP versus no CEP use during TAVR. Conclusions: The totality of evidence suggests a net benefit for the use of CEP, weighted by studies in which the Sentinal device was used. However, given the RCT subanalysis, additional evidence is needed to identify patients at the highest risk of stroke for optimal decision-making.

Association Between Pulmonary Hypertension and Its Effect on 30-Day Mortality, Readmission, and Cost After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Multicenter Study.

Background Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is commonly seen in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to improve PH, however, its impact on clinical outcomes and cost remains unclear. Methods We did a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients undergoing TAVR in our system between December 2012 to November 2020. The initial sample size was 1356. We excluded patients with prior history of heart failure, with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less, and patients who had active symptoms of heart failure within two weeks of the procedure. Patients were divided into four groups based on their pulmonary pressures, using right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) as a surrogate for PH. Groups included patients with normal pulmonary pressures (<35mmHg), mild (35-45mmHg) moderate (46-60mmHg), and severe PH (>60mmHg). Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality and readmission. Secondary outcomes included length of ICU stay and cost of admission. We used Chi-square and T-tests for demographic analysis of categorical continuous variables respectively. Adjusted regression was used for the reliability of correlation between variables. Multivariate analysis was used for final outcomes. Results Final sample size was 474. Average age was 78.9 years (SD: 8.2, 53% Male). Thirty-one percent (n=150) had normal pulmonary pressures, 33% (n=156) had mild PH, 25% (n=122) had moderate and 10% (n=46) had severe PH. Patients with history of hypertension (p-value<0.001), diabetes (p-value<0.001), chronic lung disease (p-value=0.006) and those on supplemental oxygen (p-value=0.046), had significantly higher proportion of patients with moderate and severe PH. We found significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality in patients with severe PH (OR: 6.77, CI: 1.09-41.98: p-value 0.04) compared with normal or mild PH. There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission (p-value=0.859) between the four groups. Cost did not change with severity of PH (Avg: $261,075: p-value=0.810). Patients with severe PH spent a significantly higher number of hours in ICU, compared with the other three groups (Mean: 18.2, p=value <0.001). Conclusions Severe pulmonary hypertension significantly increased the odds of 30-day mortality and ICU stay in TAVR patients. We did not see any significant difference in 30-day readmission and cost of admission, based on PH severity.

Prevalence and predictors of Twiddler's syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Twiddler's syndrome is a poorly understood clinical phenomenon when patients either consciously or subconsciously rotate their cardiac device resulting in lead dislodgement. We aimed to determine the true prevalence and risk factors associated with Twiddler's syndrome in a real-world population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent cardiac device implantation from January 1st 2017 until Jan 1st 2022. We specifically searched for the terms "Twiddler" or "Twiddler's" imbedded within the text of the medical chart. Demographic and clinical variables were collected from the electronic medical record system. We utilized multivariable logistic regression analysis as well as Kaplan-Meier prediction models to determine independent clinical predictors of Twiddler's syndrome as well as associated mortality, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty one out of 1793 patients (1.2%) were identified as having Twiddler's syndrome after chart review. Independent variables associated with Twiddler's syndrome were female sex (OR 3.76; 95% CI 1.29-10.95), antidepressant medications (OR 3.58; 95% CI 1.07-11.99), and BMI (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.31). There was no increased six-month mortality via Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that 1.2% of patients in our real-world population had evidence of Twiddler's syndrome. Independent predictors of Twiddler's syndrome include female sex, antidepressant medications as well as BMI.

Single Ventricle and Valve-in-Valve, An Impediment or a New Horizon for TAVR?

We present a case of a 30-year-old patient with Fontan physiology and prior bioprosthetic valve replacement who developed severe bioprosthetic aortic valve stenosis. We describe the challenges and planning involved to successfully perform a transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve procedure in this especially complex subset of patients. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Study of Association Between Different Coronary Artery Disease Presentations and Its Effect on Short-Term Mortality, Readmission, and Cost in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Introduction Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) is the major cause of mortality in the USA. CAD requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can have a wide spectrum of presentations. We reviewed the cost of admission and PCI at the tertiary care center stratified for different CAD presentation types. Methods We performed a retrospective study of 7,389 patients undergoing coronary angiogram at our facility from 2015 to 2017. Patients were selected from CathPCI registry. Chart review was done for readmission and death data. Cost data were provided by the finance department. Patients going for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) were excluded. We split the patients based on their need for PCI. Cost analysis was based on CAD presentation types (No symptoms, atypical symptoms, stable angina, unstable angina, NSTEMI [non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction], STEMI [ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction]). Adjusted linear regression was run for the outcomes. Primary outcomes were 30-day readmission and death. The secondary outcome was cost of admission. Results The final sample size was 6,403. The mean age was 65.6 years (SD: 12.5; male: 63.8%). 2444 required PCI (38%; p < 0.001). PCI group had lower mean age (62.5 years; SD: 12.3, p<0.001) with lower BMI (30.6 vs 31.1, p=0.015). PCI group had significantly lower odds for 30-day readmission (OR: 0.63; CI: 0.45-0.89; p=0.009) and 30-day mortality (OR:0.60; CI: 0.41-0.89; p = 0.011). A severe presentation increased the odds of getting PCI. Cost of admission was higher in all groups receiving PCI. Conclusions PCI group had better 30-day readmission and mortality rates. PCI increases the cost of admission in all CAD types.

Anomalous Coronary Origin and Malignant Course in a Young Patient With Palpitation and Demand Ischemia: A Serendipity or a Syndrome Without a Name?

Anomalous coronary artery remains the second most common cause for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young athletes. The anomaly most commonly associated with SCD is the one that courses between the aorta and pulmonary artery, the malignant course. We present a case of a young gentleman who presented with symptomatic palpitations and was found to have anomalous right coronary artery from ostial left main coronary artery coursing between the aorta and pulmonary artery.

Successful Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in a Patient with Double Aortic Arch: An Interesting Imaging Case.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a mainstay of treatment in the management of severe aortic stenosis. It is a challenging procedure that requires expertise in obtaining proper access, delivery of catheters to and beyond the aortic valve, and finally accurate deployment of the aortic bioprosthesis. Patients with aortic anomalies portend an added challenge in performing TAVR procedures. We present the case of a patient incidentally found to have a right dominant double aortic arch who underwent successful TAVR for severe aortic stenosis.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection, a commonly overlooked etiology of acute coronary syndrome.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a type of non-atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, initially thought to be uncommon but is now being increasingly recognized as a cause of acute coronary syndrome in females. The exact incidence of this remains unknown and most of these cases undergo emergent percutaneous intervention (PCI) due to concern for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prior studies have shown that PCI can be detrimental in these cases. It is important to recognize the possibility of SCAD in young female patients so that potentially harmful interventions, such as starting these patients immediately on heparin, use of thrombolytic therapy, and emergent PCI that can lead to worse outcomes, are avoided.

Feasibility and Utility of a Cardiovascular Risk Screening Tool in Women Undergoing Routine Gynecology Evaluation.

Background: The goals of this multicenter survey were to examine the prevalence and patient awareness of cardiovascular risk factors, and the association between history of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO­including gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, and preeclampsia) and prevalence of cardiovascular risks among women presenting to outpatient obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN) clinics. Materials and Methods: We surveyed 2,946 female patients attending 16 outpatient OB/GYN clinics across the United States between January 2010 and January 2012. Main outcome measures were self-reported cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms such as angina and dyspnea. Results: Mean age of the patients was 51 ± 13.6 years. Cardiovascular risks and symptoms were highly prevalent (86.0% and 40.1%, respectively). Many patients did not know if they had common risk factors such as hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or diabetes (18.4%, 32.0%, and 17.9%, respectively). Women with a history of APO were slightly more likely to be aware of common risk factors, including abnormal blood pressure (17% vs. 18.6%), high cholesterol (31.7% vs. 32%), and obesity/elevated body mass index (43.9% vs. 49.7%). Compared with patients with no history of APO, patients with APO (n = 380, 12.9%) were more likely to have risk factors (89.5% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.002) and symptoms (45.5% vs. 39.3%, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Awareness of cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms among all women surveyed in this study was poor, although awareness for some risk factors was relatively higher among patients with APO. This study demonstrates the feasibility of cardiovascular assessment in OB/GYN clinics using a simple questionnaire and its potential role for early recognition and timely intervention.

Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low Surgical Risk.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the current standard of care for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high risk for surgery. However, several recent studies have demonstrated the comparable safety and efficacy of TAVI in low-risk patients as well. We sought to pool the existing data to further assert its comparability. MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases were evaluated for relevant articles published from January 2005 to June 2019. Studies comparing outcomes of TAVI versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients who are at low risk for surgery were included. Twelve studies (5 randomized controlled trials and 7 observational studies) totaling 27,956 patients were included. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 5 years. Short-term all-cause mortality, short-term, and 1-year cardiac mortality were significantly lower in the TAVI group. One-year all-cause mortality, short-term, and 1-year stroke and myocardial infarction were similar in both groups. Rate of acute kidney injury and new-onset atrial fibrillation were lower in the TAVI group, whereas permanent pacemaker implantation and major vascular complications were higher in the TAVI group. Subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials showed significantly lower 1-year all-cause mortality in the TAVI group. In conclusion, in severe aortic stenosis patients at low surgical risk, TAVI when compared with surgical aortic valve replacement, demonstrated a lower rate of short-term all-cause mortality, short-term, and 1-year cardiac mortality and similar in terms of 1-year all-cause mortality. TAVI is emerging as a safe and efficacious alternative for low surgical risk patients.

Acute Ostial Right Coronary Artery Occlusion During Valve Deployment of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Leading to Acute Right Ventricular Failure: A Perfect Storm and Successful Navigation.

Acute coronary obstruction is a relatively rare complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Left coronary ostial obstruction is much more common compared to right coronary occlusion due to its relatively lower ostial height from the aortic annulus. We present a case of acute ostial right coronary occlusion immediately upon deployment of a 29-mm Sapien 3 transcatheter aortic valve. The acute right coronary ostial occlusion manifested with ventricular fibrillation, acute right ventricular failure, and right-sided cardiogenic shock. The patient, after undergoing an initial unsuccessful attempt at percutaneous revascularization, was placed on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). This was later transitioned to percutaneous right atrial to pulmonary artery right ventricular support, which led to subsequent recovery.

Troponin Levels at Presentation Before Coronary Angiogram and Their Association With Cost, Mortality, and Readmission.

Background and objective In patients undergoing coronary angiogram, the degree of cardiac enzyme elevation at presentation has been thought of as a strong and independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and readmission. Recent studies, however, have suggested a lack of clarity regarding this speculation, particularly with regard to troponin elevations. Additionally, the impact of troponin levels (TnI) at presentations on cost is poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association of Tnl at initial presentation with 30-day all-cause readmission and all-cause mortality as well as admission costs. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of 7,388 patients who underwent coronary angiogram at our facility from 2015 to 2017. Patients were identified from a local CathPCI Registry® registry, and a subsequent chart review was performed for readmission and mortality data. Cost data were provided by our in-facility finance department. We excluded patients with incomplete records and those who required coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). After the exclusion of patients deemed ineligible, the final sample size eligible for analysis was 1,163. Patients were divided into two groups based on Tnl at presentation with a cut-off value of 0.04 ng/ml. Adjusted regression and multivariate analysis were used for clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes were 30-day readmission and mortality. The secondary outcome was the admission cost. Results Within our cohort, the average participant age was 64.6 years (SD: 12.7), and the majority of them were male (70.7%). Of these patients, 207 had lower TnI (<0.04 ng/ml), while 956 had higher TnI at presentation. The high TnI (≥0.04 ng/ml) group had a significantly higher number of patients with a family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (13.8% vs. 7.7%: p=0.017) and those on dialysis (3.2% vs. 0.5%: p=0.028) compared to the low Tnl group. Additionally, we did not find any significant difference in 30-day mortality or readmission between the two groups in our cohort. On average, each patient in the high TnI group spent $936 more for hospital admissions compared to patients in the low Tnl group. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions Tnl at admission did not reveal a significant impact on 30-day mortality or readmission, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies. A high Tnl at admission increased the cost of admission; however, the difference was not statistically significant in our cohort.

Relation of Frailty to Cost for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Frailty is associated with significant morbidity and mortality for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In addition to clinical outcomes, cost is an important factor to inform clinical decision-making around TAVI. However, the association of frailty with cost is unknown. This study tested whether frailty was associated with cost for adult patients who underwent TAVI at a moderate-volume single center between December 2012 and April 2018 (n = 431). Frailty was determined from pre-TAVI clinical visits as a composite of 2 markers: 5-meter walk time (abnormal: >6 seconds or unable to perform) and serum albumin (abnormal: <3.5 g/dl). Patients were excluded if missing frailty assessment or covariate data (24). Cost data were derived from financial statements, and assigned at the department-level by charge code. Multivariable regression models were adjusted for age, gender, and procedural co-morbidities. Of 407 patients in the analytical sample (mean age 81 years, 49% female), 74 (18%) were determined to be frail. Adjusted mean total costs were $6,397 higher for frail patients ($78,823 vs $72,425, p = 0.042) compared with nonfrail. Higher total costs were driven by department-level charges associated with longer in-hospital length of stay (7.6 vs 3.3 days, p <0.001): room, physical therapy, pharmacy, laboratory, supply, and imaging services. Providers must address frailty proactively to salvage the benefit associated with TAVI.

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction along with Zwolle Risk Score for Risk Stratification to Enhance Safe and Early Discharge in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Introduction Zwolle risk score (ZRS) is a validated scoring system to determine the time of discharge in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) also provides prognostic information after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We studied that the addition of LVEF to ZRS variable can improve decision making in safe and early discharge in STEMI patients post-primary coronary intervention. Methods Overall, 249 STEMI patients were studied retrospectively. LVEF was considered as an independent variable. The patients having LVEF <50% were under Group A and LVEF ≥50% were under Group B. Groups were analyzed by model comparison for overall hospital length of stay (LOS) and Intensive care unit (ICU) LOS post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Results There were 123 patients in Group A and 126 patients in Group B. Comparison for primary outcomes showed significant difference with hospital length of stay (LOS) being 3.1 ± 2.3 days in Group A versus 2.1 ± 0.8 days in Group B (p < 0.001). Similarly, ICU stay was also significantly higher in Group A with 36.5 ± 31.4 hours versus 24.0 ± 11.8 hours for Group B, which led to prolonged hospitalization for patients with LVEF <50%. Model 1 that considers ZRS individually is nested within Model 2 where ZRS and LVEF are considered together. The profile log-likelihood ratio test favors model 2 over model 1 (p < 0.0001). Similarly for ICU LOS, R 2 = 0.12 (Model 1) < R 2 = 0.20 (Model 2). The F test favors model 2 over model 1 (p < 0.0001). Conclusion We concluded that adding LVEF to Zwolle risk score gives a better model for risk stratification in STEMI patients to decide early and safe discharge post-primary PCI.